|
SECTION C -- GENERAL GOVERNMENT
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM MISSION: To ensure the prudent
use of County resources.
The Financial Management component of the
Department of Management and Finance consists of Administration/Tax Policy
Coordination; Management and Budget; Accounting and Audit; and Purchasing and
Contracts.
-
Administration/Performance
Measures Division ensures that the Department of Management and Finance staff
receive the leadership, policies, tools, services and support required to serve
their customers. This program area
provides overall leadership, management and administrative support for the
Department of Management and Finance, as well as for the Department of Real
Estate Assessments (a division of DMF).
Responsibility for the development, deployment and monitoring of the
County's performance measurement system, Arlington Counts! is also integral to
this division.
-
Management and
Budget Division facilitates effective resource allocation and budget
execution for the provision of services to Arlington residents. The Management and Budget Program provides
financial, economic and policy analysis, research and recommendations to the
County Board, County Manager, departments, agencies, and the public, and
prepares the annual County operating budget. This program also coordinates
County bond sales, staffs the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) and the
Fiscal Affairs Advisory Commission, as well as monitors County expenditures and
revenues. Staff support for the
Countywide Capital Improvement Program is provided by the Management and Budget
Division.
-
Accounting and
Audit Division provides effective controls and sound financial
services. The Accounting and Audit
program provides the best possible financial information to the County Board,
County management, County staff, the public and other interested organizations
such as bond rating agencies, and institutional investors. The program also ensures that County
purchase orders and payments to vendors are processed in an accurate and timely
manner and that integrity is maintained in all financial processes and in the
financial information system.
-
Purchasing and
Contracts Division assists agencies in the purchase of needed goods and
services in a timely manner while complying with legal requirements. Purchasing and Contracts Program provides quality
goods and services which meet user customer needs at reasonable costs by
assuring that all purchasing actions are fair and impartial, with all qualified
sellers having equal access to County business. This program provides purchasing services, consults with user
agencies on bidding strategies and contract development for all County
departments and agencies, and participates in regional cooperative purchasing
efforts to achieve cost reductions through volume buying.
|
Financial
Management
|
|
FY 2004
|
FY 2005
|
FY 2006
|
% Change:
|
|
Actual
|
Adopted
|
Proposed
|
'05 to '06
|
|
Personnel
|
$2,407,464
|
$2,637,763
|
$2,690,344
|
2%
|
|
Non-Personnel
|
286,448
|
229,568
|
223,510
|
-3%
|
|
Subtotal
|
2,693,912
|
2,867,331
|
2,913,854
|
2%
|
|
Intra-County
Charges
|
(30,997)
|
(53,000)
|
(117,850)
|
122%
|
|
Total Expenditures
|
2,662,915
|
2,814,331
|
2,796,004
|
-1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
137,930
|
95,000
|
105,416
|
11%
|
|
Total Revenues
|
137,930
|
95,000
|
105,416
|
11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Tax Support
|
$2,524,985
|
$2,719,331
|
$2,690,588
|
-1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized FTEs
|
33.0
|
33.0
|
34.0
|
-
|
|
Funded FTEs
|
33.0
|
33.0
|
34.0
|
-
|
SIGNIFICANT BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS:
-
Personnel expenditures reflect a two percent increase made
to fully fund all step increases for eligible employees and employee benefits
as well as the addition of a Contract Monitoring Position ($64,850 and 1.0
FTE).
-
Non-Personnel reflects a decrease ($6,058) due to a
decrease in telephone charges.
-
Intra-County Charges increased due to the cost of one
additional FTE for Contract Monitoring ($64,850) being charged out to Utilities
Fund.
-
Revenues have increased due to an increase in administration
fees from the Rosslyn Bid Project ($10,416).
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Administration/Performance
Measures
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY2003 Actual
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Estimate
|
FY2006 Goal
|
|
Mission Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
internal department's personnel transactions processed satisfactorily within
guidelines
|
N/A
|
97%
|
N/A
|
99%
|
99%
|
100%
|
|
Percent of
department financial transactions satisfactorily processed within established
timeframes
|
N/A
|
98%
|
N/A
|
99%
|
99%
|
100%
|
|
Percent of
departments/ programs using outcome measures
|
40%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
Percent of
departments/ programs using customer measures
|
N/A
|
25%
|
99%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal customer
satisfaction index
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
|
Percent of
department payroll transactions processed without error
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
99%
|
99%
|
100%
|
|
Percent of grams
processed on time
|
N/A
|
95%
|
95%
|
99%
|
99%
|
100%
|
- Some of the measurements
identified above are newly identified and no historical information is
available. Data collection for these
performance measures will commence in FY 2005.
-
Internal customer
satisfaction index will be based a rating scale from 1 to 100 which will be
acquired through a survey regarding DMF products and processes in CY 2005, and
measures will be reflected in 2005 Actual and 2006 Estimates. The target
benchmark of 80 is established utilizing the American Customer Satisfaction
Index through comparisons with other public and private sector organizations
providing similar services.
Management and Budget
|
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Actual
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Goal
|
|
Mission
Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond rating (by
rating agency - S&P/Moody's/ Fitch)
|
AAA/
Aaa/
AAA
|
AAA/
Aaa/
AAA
|
AAA/
Aaa/
AAA
|
AAA/
Aaa/
AAA
|
AAA/
Aaa/
AAA
|
AAA/
Aaa/
AAA
|
|
GFOA Distinguished Budget Award received
(yes/no)
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Percent variance between actual expenditures
and appropriation (based on final audit report, total General Fund)
|
2%
|
4%
|
4.2%
|
<5%
|
<5%
|
<5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal customer satisfaction index
|
73.9
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
|
Percent of customer requests fulfilled by
established timeframes
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
95%
|
98%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workload Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond issuance (millions), general obligation bonds, notes sold or refinanced
|
$39.5
|
$140.8
|
$60.1
|
$174.0
|
86.20
|
N/A
|
|
Industrial Development Authority (IDA) bonds issued
|
$159.4
|
$11.2
|
$9.0
|
$149.2
|
$15.0
|
N/A
|
|
Dollar value of other financings obtained (millions)
|
$4.5
|
$12.6
|
$103.1
|
$6.5
|
$5.0
|
N/A
|
|
Total dollar value of transactions (millions)
|
$203.4
|
$164.6
|
172.2
|
$329.7
|
$106.2
|
N/A
|
-
Several of the
measurements identified above are new requirements and no historical
information is available. Data collection
for these performance measures will commence in FY 2005.
-
FY 2002 customer satisfaction index is based on survey
results from customers of the Management and Budget Division. An expanded Department wide survey will be
conducted in FY 2005 to solicit feedback on all DMF products and services. The
target benchmark of 80 is established utilizing the American Customer
Satisfaction Index through comparisons with other public and private sector
organizations providing similar services.
Accounting and Audit
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Actual
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Goal
|
|
Mission Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report (CAFR) received "unqualified" opinion from external
auditors
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
CAFR received
GFOA "Certificate of Achievement for Excellence"
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Auditor of
Public Accounts Transmittal and CAFR prepared by state deadline
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
State Auditor of Public Accounts
Transmittal of Comments received (regarding the CAFR)
|
7
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
Countywide payments processed within payment terms
|
N/A
|
75%
|
81%
|
85%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
Internal customer
satisfaction index
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workload Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment vouchers processed
|
42,800
|
45,500
|
41,549
|
46,000
|
46,000
|
46,000
|
-
Typically, three or
fewer comments on the State Auditor of Public Accounts Transmittal of Comments
are indicative of a high level of achievement and performance regarding the
CAFR. This pertains to the translation
of the CAFR to the Auditor of Public Accounts format.
-
Customer satisfaction index will be based on FY 2005
survey results from customers of the Accounting and Audit Division. The target benchmark of 80 is established utilizing
the American Customer Satisfaction Index through comparisons with other public
and private sector organizations providing similar services.
Purchasing and
Contracts
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Actual
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Goal
|
|
Mission Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of protests of purchasing actions upheld
by a final authority (court)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Number of contracts that lapsed without timely
replacement due to purchasing action or inaction
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal customer
satisfaction index
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
80%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
Percent of customer requests fulfilled within
established timeframes
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
95%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workload Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal bids
and contracts processed
|
404
|
457
|
471
|
460
|
460
|
460
|
| Informal
bids and contracts processed |
448
|
553
|
326
|
350
|
350
|
350
|
|
Emergency procurements
processed
|
79
|
109
|
92
|
110
|
110
|
110
|
-
Several of the
measurements identified above are new requirements and no historical
information is available. Data
collection for these performance measures will commence in FY 2005.
-
Customer satisfaction
index will be based on FY 2005 survey results from customers of the Purchasing
Division. The target benchmark of 80
is established utilizing the American Customer Satisfaction Index through
comparisons with other public and private sector organizations providing
similar services.
-
Decrease in number of informal bids and contracts
processed due to increased agency awareness of contracts through access to
information.
|
|