|
SECTION C -- GENERAL GOVERNMENT
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT BUDGET SUMMARY
MISSION STATEMENT: To provide the technology resources for the County and set
the vision for future technology investments.
The work of the Department of
Technology Services continues to be founded on the goals established in the
e-Government Master Plan of 2001:
-
To be
responsive to the needs of the community;
-
To set the
technology direction and standardization for all information technology
initiatives;
-
To implement the best practices of program management;
-
To
re-engineer and streamline the delivery of government processes;
-
To implement a network infrastructure to support the
e-Government initiatives;
-
To create a
data architecture to define the e-Government services;
-
To build
information services architecture for delivery of e-Government services.
These goals have been expanded in
the e-Government Master Plan II: Realizing the Vision, 2004 – 2009. The primary theme is to build upon the
first plan by recommending that all future technology investments be determined
by the business needs of the County.
FY 2006 PRIORITIES: The FY 2006 priorities
of the Department of Technology Services are:
-
To continue
to implement the electronic government plan by understanding the business needs
of the County and to select appropriate technology investments that will
further the satisfaction of these goals.
-
To manage
the expansion of the current network and system architecture.
-
To continue
the development of policies, procedures and standards.
-
To gather metrics and recommend the alignment of staff
to effectively support the technology needs of the County.
- To
grow the technology expertise of the subject experts in the departments so that
effective technology investments can be made to further their departmental
goals.
- To
develop approaches to fully identify the total cost of ownership of technology
acquisitions.
- To
create programs that accommodate the scheduled refreshment of technology
resources and the incorporation of new technologies as appropriate that
furthers the effectiveness and efficiency of the County.
PRINCIPAL PROGRAMS:
-
Network Services:
Network Management Telecommunications Desktop Support
-
Information Services:
Computer Operations Applications
-
Office of the Chief Information Officer:
Cable Administration
SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES: The FY 2006 proposed budget for the
Department of Technology Services is $14,064,990, a four percent increase from
the FY 2005 adopted budget. The
proposed budget includes the following significant changes:
-
An increase in personnel expenditures ($408,324) for
normal salary and benefits adjustments as well as the re-allocation of 4.0 FTEs
(1.0 FTE from the Department of Community Planning, Housing and Development and
3.0 FTEs from the Department of Human Services) to Desktop Support. The reallocation of 4.0 FTEs totals $261,620.
-
An increase in non-personnel expenditures ($216,536) to
fund an increase in Verizon telecommunications, records and storage maintenance
contracts.
|
DEPARTMENT
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
|
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Adopted
|
FY 2006 Proposed
|
% Change: '05 to '06
|
|
Personnel
|
$5,461,856
|
$5,697,496
|
$6,105,820
|
7%
|
|
Non-Personnel
|
9,757,082
|
10,483,662
|
10,700,198
|
2%
|
|
Subtotal
|
15,218,938
|
16,181,158
|
16,806,018
|
4%
|
|
Intra-County Charges
|
(3,035,356)
|
(2,709,101)
|
(2,741,028)
|
1%
|
|
Total Expenditures
|
12,183,582
|
13,472,057
|
14,064,990
|
4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
417,800
|
281,000
|
285,050
|
1%
|
|
Net Tax Support
|
$11,765,782
|
$13,191,057
|
$13,779,940
|
4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized FTEs
|
61.7
|
61.7
|
65.7
|
|
|
Funded FTEs
|
61.7
|
61.7
|
65.7
|
|
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Actual
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Goal
|
|
Mission Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects completed/projects identified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects responding to Arlington's
constituencies
|
3/7
|
5/7
|
6/7
|
7/7
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Projects that re-engineer/re-invent the
organization processes
|
11/21
|
14/21
|
15/21
|
17/21
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Projects that require program management
|
3/11
|
6/11
|
8/11
|
8/11
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Projects to create a data architecture
|
4/17
|
10/17
|
11/17
|
12/17
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Projects to build a scalable, reliable network
infrastructure
|
14/30
|
18/30
|
20/30
|
21/30
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Projects that define e-Government services
|
2/15
|
6/15
|
6/15
|
7/15
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Projects completed in support of the e-Government Master Plan II:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enable the fulfillment of County services
through well-considered technology investments
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
13
|
8
|
8
|
|
Provide for the easy and efficient access to
information for residents, businesses, and County staff
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
|
Ensure continuity of County services in an
emergency
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of customers rating DTS overall
performance as "good" or "very good"
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
85%
|
90%
|
90%
|
95%
|
|
Percent of customers rating DTS overall Help
Desk performance as "good" or "very good"
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
85%
|
90%
|
90%
|
95%
|
|
Percent of customers rating DTS overall
Telecommunications Unit performance as "good" or "very good"
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
85%
|
90%
|
90%
|
95%
|
|
Percent of customers rating DTS overall Network
Services unit performance as "good" or "very good"
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
85%
|
90%
|
90%
|
95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of customers rating DTS overall Program
Management unit performance as "good" or "very good"
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
85%
|
90%
|
90%
|
95%
|
|
Percent of customers rating DTS overall
Information Services unit performance as "good" or "very good"
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
85%
|
90%
|
90%
|
95%
|
|
Percent of customers rating DTS overall Data
Management unit performance as "good" or "very good"
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
85%
|
90%
|
90%
|
95%
|
-
In FY 2005 and FY 2006, the CIO will be guided by the
new IT strategic plan entitled "e-Government Master Plan II" which
establishes a new set of strategic goals. Revised measures have been included
to measure performance against those goals established by the new plan.
-
Performance measures that were used under the first
strategic plan "e-Government Master Plan I" are presented as N/A in FY 2005 and
FY 2006 and their purpose is to show historical information. New measures that are refined for
"e-Government Master Plan II" show N/A for FY 2002-FY 2004, however project
estimates for FY 2005 and FY 2006.
FUTURE BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS:
-
Meeting increased demand for more content-oriented
electronic government solutions that will permit the constituent to interact
directly with internal government systems to conduct business, to pay fees,
fines and taxes, and participate in the political process in a timely manner.
-
Transitioning the enterprise systems (human resources
information/payroll, financial management, budget preparation, and revenue assessment
and collection) from a costly mainframe environment to an open and flexible
web-based architecture will require significant investment over the next
several years. This investment is necessary because the business needs of the
County have outgrown the capabilities of these aging systems, and furthermore
many of these systems are soon to be no longer supported by their vendors.
-
Development of individuals who are able to express
business solutions so they can be adapted technologically could require additional
training and recruiting advanced level technology skill sets.
-
The County is moving toward a more structured process
for the periodic refreshment of its technology investments. Many of the
existing systems are far past their useful lifespan, resulting in increased
operating and maintenance costs and reduced ability to share information and
respond to the growing expectations and needs of Arlington residents and
businesses. This program may initially require some additional resources to
refresh systems having the greatest need.
|
|