|
Print Version (PDF format)
SECTION G -- HUMAN SERVICES
CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES FOR AT-RISK YOUTH
PROGRAM MISSION: To ensure coordination of high quality, cost effective services
to families whose children are at risk of placement outside of their homes and
community by facilitating collaboration among families, child serving agencies,
and private providers. The goal of this
coordinated effort is to preserve and strengthen families, maintain children in
the community, identify at-risk youth and intervene as early as possible.
State law mandates the Comprehensive
Services Act for Youth and Families (CSA). The populations served, as defined
by state statute, are divided into "mandated" and "non-mandated"
categories. The mandated category
includes youth in imminent danger of out-of-home placement, youth in foster
care, and youth whose special education needs cannot be provided within the
public schools. The state requires localities to fund mandated services and
guarantees a reimbursement based on a complex funding formula. For Arlington, the required local share is
approximately 46 percent of the costs, based on the revised funding formula.
The "non-mandated" category includes all other youth whose behaviors or family
situations put them at-risk of out-of-home placements, especially youth
involved with the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court. Services
include family counseling, case management, foster care, special education and
a variety of support services. Separate program descriptions are included in
Family Services Teams (Child Protective Services, Foster Care and Adoption) and
the Arlington Public Schools' budget.
-
CSA Administration provides interagency
coordination for CSA implementation, through organization and facilitation of
Community Assessment Teams; utilization management and review of active cases;
monitoring of regulatory and policy changes; education of agency case
management staff; support of the Community
Policy and Management Team; facilitation of the CSA Management Team; and
assessment of community services and development of services missing from the
continuum of care.
-
The Alternatives to Residential Treatment (ART)
Program prevents the placement of youths in expensive residential
facilities and transitions youths back into the community who had been placed
in residential care by ensuring that intensive community-based, family-focused
services are provided for youths and their families.
-
The Juvenile and
Domestic Relations District Court serves children whose severe emotional
and or behavioral problems place them at-risk of more serious placement by the
Courts; services funded include family counseling, case management, and, as a
last resort, placement in a residential facility.
|
Comprehensive
Services for At-Risk Youth
|
|
FY 2004
|
FY 2005
|
FY 2006
|
% Change:
|
|
Actual
|
Adopted
|
Proposed
|
'05 to '06
|
|
Personnel
|
$396,350
|
$414,395
|
$432,819
|
4%
|
|
Non-Personnel
|
26,119
|
29,707
|
26,206
|
-12%
|
|
Nonprofits
|
37,946
|
37,946
|
37,946
|
-
|
|
Purchase of
Service
|
192,354
|
312,000
|
312,000
|
-
|
|
Total Expenditures
|
652,769
|
794,048
|
808,971
|
2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Share
|
74,425
|
64,938
|
64,936
|
-
|
|
Purchase of
Service Rev
|
103,832
|
168,417
|
168,417
|
-
|
|
Total Revenues
|
178,257
|
233,355
|
233,353
|
-
|
|
Net Tax Support
|
$474,512
|
$560,693
|
$575,618
|
3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized FTEs
|
6.5
|
6.5
|
6.5
|
|
|
Funded FTEs
|
6.5
|
6.5
|
6.5
|
|
SIGNIFICANT BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS:
-
Increase in personnel costs is due to normal step
increases and the reclassification of a position.
-
Non-personnel costs decrease due to decreased projections
for telephone charges.
-
The FTE count does not change from FY 2005 to FY 2006,
but reflects the net effect of
reallocating a 1.0 FTE position from Divisional Management to CSA for the
ART Program, and reallocating a 1.0 FTE position from CSA to the Community
Based Mental Health and Mental Retardation/Developmental Disabilities Services
(Community Based Services) Team.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
CSA Administration
|
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Actual
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Goal
|
|
Mission
Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of cases in compliance with utilization management policies
|
N/A
|
93%
|
88%
|
96%
|
98%
|
98%
|
|
Percentage
of foster care expenditures covered by Medicaid
|
15%
|
16%
|
23%
|
24%
|
25%
|
25%
|
|
Percentage
of foster care expenditures covered by IV-E funding
|
15%
|
34%
|
27%
|
30%
|
34%
|
34%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of parents surveyed who report satisfaction with the Community Assessment
Team process
|
99%
|
99%
|
99%
|
99%
|
99%
|
99%
|
|
Percentage
of case managers surveyed who report satisfaction with the Community
Assessment Team process
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
68%
|
78%
|
86%
|
86%
|
|
Percentage
of case managers surveyed who report that the vendors met or exceeded service
standards
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
89%
|
94%
|
98%
|
98%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workload Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
children for which funding was provided
|
309
|
330
|
320
|
310
|
307
|
307
|
|
Average
expenditure per child
|
$24,639
|
$23,473
|
$26,378
|
$28,500
|
$32,500
|
$32,500
|
|
Percentage
of eligible families where co-payment was assessed/amount collected
|
68%/ $1,126
|
83%/ $623
|
81%/ $7,060
|
100%/ $8,000
|
100%/ N/A
|
100%/ N/A
|
|
Percentage
of families whose children are in foster care who were referred to child support enforcement
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Reduced
compliance rate with Utilization Management policies is related to workload
demands of staff in critical cases.
-
Percentage
of Medicaid coverage is low due to increased frequency in denial of claims submitted
by one service provider.
-
Increased
average expenditures are attributable to both increased demand for residential
services and continual rising cost of this level of care.
-
Customer
measures described above started in FY 2004.
-
Changes in
organizational structure and procedures will ensure improved collection methods
of co-payment beginning in the latter half of FY 2005.
Alternatives to Residential Treatment (ART)
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Actual
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Goal
|
|
Mission Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number/percent of clients
remaining in the community at discharge or at end of one year
|
20/95%
|
18/90%
|
14/88%
|
18/90%
|
20/91%
|
23/92%
|
|
Projected
cost avoidance based on service months in community
|
$882,900
|
$818,100
|
$639,900
|
$842,400
|
$963,900
|
$1,150,200
|
|
Number/percent
of service months with clients in residential placements
|
23/17%
|
9/8%
|
1/19%
|
6/6%
|
6/5%
|
8/5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of referral sources
reporting improved client functioning
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
75%
|
85%
|
90%
|
95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workload
Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total youth served
|
21
|
20
|
16
|
20
|
22
|
28
|
|
Total client service months
|
132
|
110
|
80
|
110
|
125
|
150
|
-
Decrease in
total youth served in FY 2004 is due to a long-term staff vacancy and
diminished staffing level in ART to cover increased demand in foster care, a
mandated service.
-
Cost
avoidance is the projected amount of residential cost if the youth had not remained in the community.
-
Customer
measures described above were implemented in FY 2004.
Juvenile and
Domestic Relations District Court
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Actual
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Goal
|
|
Mission
Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number/percent of youth
retained in the community through in-home services
|
12/100%
|
20/100%
|
19/100%
|
15/100%
|
19/100%
|
24/100%
|
|
Number /percent of youth
placed in residential facilities through CSA
|
7/37%
|
2/9%
|
4/17%
|
6/29%
|
5/21%
|
1/14%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number/percent of Probation
Counselors reporting behavioral change in clients receiving services
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
13/83%
|
14/85%
|
14/85%
|
15/95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workload Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Youth Served:
|
19
|
22
|
23
|
21
|
24
|
25
|
|
In-home services
|
12
|
20
|
19
|
15
|
19
|
24
|
|
Residential facility
|
7
|
2
|
4
|
6
|
5
|
1
|
|
Percent of at-risk
youth on probation who received
services
|
5%
|
6%
|
7%
|
6%
|
7%
|
7%
|
|
|