|
Print Version (PDF format)
SECTION N -- ENTERPRISE, SPECIAL REVENUE and INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS
UTILITIES FUND
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL BUREAU
PROGRAM MISSION: To safely and economically process
wastewater and hazardous waste material for a healthy environment.
The primary objective of the
Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) is to protect the public health and the
environment through the cost-effective treatment and disposal of wastewater
generated in Arlington County. The WPCP
also treats a portion of the wastewater from Fairfax County and the Cities of
Falls Church and Alexandria, as well as wastewater from Ronald Reagan
Washington National Airport, the Pentagon and other federal facilities. Virginia's Departments of Environmental
Quality (DEQ), Health (VDH) and Occupational Safety and Health (VOSH) and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulate the activities of the WPCP.
In the WPCP's pursuit of becoming
a high-performance organization it has adopted cutting-edge technological
advances to improve its efficiency, automated and streamlined processes, and implemented
cost-savings measures such as the automation of chemical feeding systems and
the upgrading of equipment to meet new efficiency requirements. Process modifications have resulted in more
efficient processing, a significant reduction of odors, and lower biosolids
disposal costs.
The WPCP continues to focus
on performing scheduled preventive and predictive maintenance to minimize
costly, unplanned equipment failure and replacement, ensure the lowest net
20-year life-cycle costs and improve regulatory compliance. The WPCP has implemented several
pay-for-skill pilot programs such as the Certified Control System Technicians,
Licensed Electrical Power Technicians, Multi-skilled Wastewater Plant Operator
Pilot program and the Wastewater Maintenance Technician pilot pay programs. These programs will address anticipated high
employee turnover due to retirements over the next ten years, improve
maintenance skill levels, and are expected to stabilize long-term staffing
requirements at the current levels and attract and retain quality staff.
The above initiatives coupled
with the Master Plan 2001 Update (the long-range infrastructure plan) will
bring the WPCP much closer to model facility status.
Household Hazardous Material
Program (HHM) is directly related to the WPCP's mission of protecting the
public health and the environment. HHM
are household products that contain hazardous ingredients requiring special
waste management because of their hazardous characteristics (i.e., flammable, corrosive,
reactive, toxic), which otherwise could pose a potential threat to human health
and the environment if disposed of improperly.
The HHM program provides safe collection of unwanted HHM material and
ensures its proper disposal as part of a comprehensive strategy that:
-
Promotes citizen awareness regarding proper handling of
HHM;
-
Reduces the amount of HHM mixed with municipal solid
wastes;
-
Reduces the amount of HHM which is discharged into sanitary
or storm sewer systems; and
-
Helps to reduce the risk of injuries to sanitation workers,
the community at large, and the environment.
The
HHM program maintains a permanent collection facility on the grounds of the
WPCP where County residents may drop off HHM every Saturday from 9 AM to 3 PM
on a walk-in, drop-off basis, or by appointment with the HHM Coordinator during
weekdays. In addition, the HHM program
promotes and manages two off-site, regularly scheduled (bi-annual) special
collection and recycling events.
|
Water Pollution Control
|
|
FY 2004
|
FY 2005
|
FY 2006
|
% Change:
|
|
Actual
|
Adopted
|
Proposed
|
'05 to '06
|
|
Personnel
|
$6,305,626
|
$6,832,469
|
$7,046,750
|
3%
|
|
Non-Personnel
|
7,077,689
|
7,615,497
|
8,000,542
|
5%
|
|
Total Expenditures
|
$13,383,315
|
$14,447,966
|
$15,047,292
|
4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized FTEs
|
92.6
|
92.6
|
92.6
|
|
|
Funded FTEs
|
92.6
|
92.6
|
92.6
|
|
SIGNIFICANT BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS:
- Personnel increases include annual salary step
adjustments, and position reclassifications ($214,281).
-
Non-personnel increases ($385,000)
include higher electricity costs ($176,940), security guard contract for increasing
to three security guards during construction ($28,552), increase in the cost of
wastewater treatment chemicals and maintenance supplies ($60,000), and higher
costs for hauling of bio-solids ($56,000) and household hazardous material
($41,000).
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Actual
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Goal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mission Outcome Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notices of violations (NOVs)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Preventive maintenance percent completed on time
|
62%
|
97%
|
90%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
Number
of bypass events per year
|
1
|
8
|
9
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
|
Bypasses/volume (mg)
|
18.9
|
200.8
|
81.0
|
15.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Odor complaints
|
57
|
39
|
14
|
50
|
25
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workload Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
average flow (MGD: million gallons per day)
|
29.3
|
31.6
|
31.6
|
31.0
|
31.0
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency
Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
per million gallons of actual total average flow
|
$1,019
|
$1,079
|
$1,155
|
$1,227
|
$1,279
|
$1,279
|
|
Cost
per million gallons of rated capacity (30 MGD)
|
$995
|
$1,137
|
$1,216
|
$1,268
|
$1,321
|
$1,321
|
-
FY 2003 was one of the wettest years in the history of the
state. The bulk of the bypasses
occurred during two storms in February and March 2003. The temporary repair efforts for the lime
reaction tanks also caused operational challenges that impacted the number and
volume of bypasses.
-
The installation of the equalization tank in FY 2001 and
the addition of other process modifications significantly reduced the number of
bypass events and gallons bypassed compared to making no improvements. While
the Master Plan 2001 (when completed in 2012) should allow the WPCP to
eliminate virtually all bypasses, the WPCP remains vulnerable to bypasses in
the interim.
-
Installation of infrastructure for odor control is an
ongoing focus of the WPCP. The goal is
to record no complaints throughout the year.
The WPCP Master Plan 2001 Update will install additional odor control
capability.
-
The total average flow measure is the total amount of
sanitary sewage (actual) entering the Water Pollution Control Plant in million
gallons per day (MGD). Rated flow
capacity is 30 MGD according to design specifications.
-
The cost per million gallons (MG) of capacity as measured
by actual total average flow includes total personnel and operating costs,
minus the payment that the County makes to Fairfax County to treat part of
Arlington's wastewater per an inter-jurisdictional agreement.
-
The cost per million gallons (MG) of total rated flow
capacity includes total personnel and operating costs minus the payment that
the Count makes to Fairfax County to treat part of Arlington's wastewater, per
an inter-jurisdictional agreement.
Household Hazardous Material (HHM)
|
FY 2002 Actual
|
FY 2003 Actual
|
FY 2004 Actual
|
FY 2005 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Estimate
|
FY 2006 Goal
|
|
Workload Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
number household hazardous material drop-offs
|
2,700
|
2,995
|
3,378
|
4,000
|
4,500
|
5,175
|
|
Number
of pounds of household hazardous material received
|
147,236
|
195,958
|
245,650
|
280,000
|
285,000
|
313,500
|
-
The WPCP management is evaluating how to expand the program
to increase the amount of harmful material channeled into safe disposal
methods.
FUTURE BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS:
-
The WPCP Master Plan 2001 Update final draft was completed
in November 2002 concerning future capital requirements. The upgrade and expansion of the facility
will have an impact on out-year operating budgets due to the pending
requirements to meet lower total nitrogen in the effluent.
-
There is potential for significant long-term impact on
costs from the implementation, approximately within five to ten years, of the
DEQ Potomac Tributary strategies.
-
Out-year costs for biosolids handling are anticipated to
increase as more stringent regulations for Class B biosolids increases the
disposal costs. Additional disposal
cost increases are expected when Class A biosolids become required by
regulatory action.
|
|